Which of the following informal assessment strategies would likely be most effective in evaluating students' ability to analyze story elements and make personal connections with the text?

The most effective strategy for evaluating students' ability to analyze story elements and make personal connections with the text is conducting a group discussion about the text. This method allows students to express their thoughts and insights openly and interactively.

During a group discussion, students can delve into various story elements such as character motivations, plot development, and themes. They can also share personal connections they’ve made, facilitating a deeper understanding of the text. This collaborative environment encourages critical thinking, as students must articulate their ideas and respond to the perspectives of their peers, enhancing their analytical skills in real-time.

In contrast, the other methods, such as pretending to be a character or completing a multiple-choice quiz, might provide some insights but lack the depth needed for comprehensive analysis and personal connection. A written summary may demonstrate comprehension of the story but does not foster discussion or deeper engagement with the text. Group discussions encourage exploration and critical analysis, which are essential for evaluating the ability to analyze story elements effectively.